Open with quick check-ins, pronounce names, and agree on signals for pause or rewind. Use a warm-up like “yes, and” circles to normalize experimentation. When permission is explicit and reversible, peers risk bolder choices, challenge assumptions kindly, and remain curious when scenes stumble or emotions flare.
Before role-play begins, identify the skill focus, desired behaviors, and success criteria in concrete language. Peers then watch with intention, avoiding vague platitudes. Specific goals make patterns visible, shorten debriefs, and help everyone recognize when to celebrate progress or redirect effort with targeted adjustments.
Assign rotating roles—speaker, observer, coach, and timekeeper—so feedback burdens and opportunities are shared. Rotations combat status dynamics, elevate quieter voices, and reveal blind spots. Clear responsibilities help observers capture evidence, while timekeepers protect energy, ensuring debriefs remain crisp, respectful, and outcome-oriented.
Use Situation-Behavior-Impact or Situation-Task-Action-Result to anchor comments. Write exactly what you saw or heard, then note the effect. This structure keeps remarks concrete, reduces defensiveness, and creates a clear bridge from observation to targeted improvement experiments in the next cycle.
Build checklists around capabilities like questioning, empathy, reframing, or objection handling. Peers tick boxes only when behaviors are observable, leaving space for quotes. Checklists prevent drift, enable trend tracking across sessions, and make progress visible for individuals and teams without bloated documentation.
All Rights Reserved.